What Most B2B Companies Get Wrong About GEO

GEO, or Generative Engine Optimization, is getting a lot of attention right now. And with that attention comes a lot of assumptions that aren't quite right.

The assumption: If you rank on Google, AI tools will find you, too.

The reality: Only 23% of sources cited by AI actually appear in Google's top ten results for the same query. SEO and GEO are related, but they're not the same system.

The assumption: GEO means publishing more content.

The reality: Volume has almost nothing to do with it. Companies publishing fifty blog posts a month aren't cited more than companies publishing eight great ones. AI rewards specificity and structure, not quantity.

The assumption: You can't influence what AI recommends.

The reality: You can. Specific, well-structured content with real data points, named sources, and clear information about who you are and what you do measurably increases how often AI tools cite and recommend you.

For B2B manufacturers, the practical takeaway is straightforward. The same things that make your website useful to a human buyer, like clear service pages, concrete capabilities, and specific industry experience, are exactly what AI systems need to include you in a recommendation.

GEO isn't a reinvention of your marketing strategy. It's a refinement of what good digital presence already looks like. The companies getting it right aren't doing something radically different. They're just being clearer, more specific, and more credible online. Which, honestly, is what we've always been after anyway.

Studio x. helps B2B companies and manufacturers build digital presences that perform. In search, in AI, and everywhere in between. Let's talk.

Sources: Zyppy 2025 AI Citation Study, Princeton/Georgia Tech/IIT Delhi GEO Research 2024

Previous
Previous

The x. Files: Reflections on Entrepreneurship

Next
Next

The x. Files: Your Space is Your Strategy